Blogs of Professor(Dr.) Pranab Kumar Bhattacharyya MD(calcutta.Univ) Pathology;

Blogson TheoreticalPhysics;Astronomy; MedicalSciences,Pathology; etc.All contents,words, Syllables &;Scientificallymeaning ful sentences of all blogsposted are Strictly Copy Righted material to ProfDr Pranab Kumar Bhattacharya under IPR Copy Right Acts sections-306/301/3D/107/1012/ RDF and Protect Intellectual Property Right ACT of USA-2012. Don't try to infringe, to avoid huge civil/criminal proceedings in IPR Court: Acknowledgement for all my blogs to my Spouse Mrs Sumita Bhattacharya

Tuesday, 19 November 2013

US kiddie flu shot trials underway 21 Aug 2009 | 19:50 GMT | Posted by Elie Dolgin | Category: Swine flu


  1. http://blogs.nature.com/news/2009/08/kiddy_flu_shot_trials_underway.html








  2. Breaking news from the world of science


    Advanced search




    • News & Comment
    • News Blog
    • Post








    NATURE NEWS BLOG

    US kiddie flu shot trials underway

    21 Aug 2009 | 19:50 GMT | Posted by Elie Dolgin | Category: Swine flu06 Sep 2009 16:10 GMT
    Report this comment
    Professor Pranab Kumar Bhattacharya said:
    Title-:A second wave of swine flue coming in tropical countries
    Authors-:
    Professor Pranab Kumar Bhattacharya MD (cal Univ) FIC Path(Ind.),Professor of Pathology, In charge of Histopathology unit, in charge- Cytogenetics, Blood Bank &VCCTCInstitute of Post Graduate Medical Education & Research[IPGME&R] ,244a AJC Bose Road, Kolkata-20, W.B, India,Bhattacharya Rupak Bsc(cal) MSC, Bhattacharya Ritwik, B.Com(Cal) of 7/51 Purbapalli,PO- Sodepur N-24 Parganas, Kol-110. W.B, , Mukherjee Dalia BA cal, Mukherjee Debasis Bsc(cal), Bhattacharya Upasana-student Bagchi Subrata MD Asst. Professor Community Medicine.- N.R.S Medical College kol,W.B, India, Dr Avisnata Das MBBS, Dey Sujit MD,Asst. Professor, Biochemistry, IPGME&R kol-20 ,
    The WHO says that many countries in tropical regions (represented by Central America and tropical regions of Asia including India), will continue to see increasing or sustained high levels of influenza activity with some countries reporting moderate amount strains on their healthcare system. In temperate areas of the northern hemisphere (represented by North America, Europe, and Central Asia ,India), H1N1 influenza and respiratory disease activity remains though however low overall, with some countries and some provinces experiencing only localized or pocket outbreaks of the disease. In Japan, the level of influenza activity has passed the seasonal epidemic threshold, signaling a very early beginning to the annual influenza season. Pandemic H1N1 influenza virus continues to be the predominant circulating strain of influenza, both in the northern and southern hemisphere of world 1 Total laboratory confirmed cases reported up to 23rd August 2009 by H1N1 over 2,09,438 while death occurred in at Least 2185 cases (1.04%) globally as per WHO, while death confirmed by CDC were 522 by 15th august 2009. In India death occurred in more then 130 cases up to 31 st August 2009.The countries and overseas territories/communities that have newly reported their first pandemic (H1N1) 2009 confirmed case(s) since the last web update as of 23 August 2009 are: Cameroon, Madagascar, and Mozambique. 1
    Region Cumulative total
    as of 23 Aug 2009
    Cases* Deaths
    WHO Regional Office for Africa (AFRO) 3843 11
    WHO Regional Office for the Americas (AMRO) 110113 1876
    WHO Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean (EMRO) 3128 10
    WHO Regional Office for Europe (EURO) Over 42,557 At least 85
    WHO Regional Office for South-East Asia (SEARO) 15771 139
    WHO Regional Office for the Western Pacific (WPRO) 34026 64
    Total Over 209438 At Least 2185
    *Given that countries are no longer required to test and report individual cases, the number of cases reported actually understates the real number of cases.
    Too rapid spread
    2009 influenza pandemic has spread internationally with an unprecedented speed. In past, in all flue pandemics, flu viruses had needed more than six months to spread as widely as the new H1N1 virus, which has spread in less than five or six weeks. It is due to that international air travel is far more common then in previous pandemic times
    A second wave is coming _:
    WHO is advising the countries in northern hemisphere of planet to get them prepared in their health care infrastructure for a second wave of H1N1 pandemic spread? Countries with tropical climates, where the pandemic virus arrived much later than elsewhere, like in India also need to be prepared for a gradual increasing number of cases. Evidence from multiple outbreak sites demonstrates that the H1N1 pandemic virus has rapidly established itself and is now the dominant influenza strain in most parts of the world particularly in USA. The pandemic will persist in the coming months as the virus continues to move through susceptible populations
    The clinical picture of pandemic influenza is largely consistent across all countries. The overwhelming majority of patients continued to experience mild to moderate illness. Although the virus can cause very severe and fatal illness, also in young and healthy people, the number of such cases however remains small over all the world. However large numbers of people in all countries will remain susceptible to infection during the 2nd wave. Even if the current pattern of usually mild illness continues, the impact of the pandemic during 2nd wave is larger numbers of severely ill patients requiring more and more intensive care infrastructure are likely to be the most coming urgent burden on health services, creating pressures that could overwhelm intensive care units and possibly disrupt the provision of care for other diseases. The age groups affected by the pandemic are generally younger. Most higher risk population who will require probably hospitalization and will experience higher death rate are among certain subgroups like Obese people, those are suffering from asthma, COPD, T.B, diabetes, hypertension, people living under socio economic deprived conditions like poverty laden people[60% people in west Bengal provinces] of India and people having multiple health problems, with little access to basic health care. This is true for those most frequently infected, and especially so for those experiencing severe or fatal illness. To date, most severe cases and deaths have occurred in adults under the age of 50 years, with deaths in the elderly comparatively rare. This age distribution is in sharp contrast with seasonal influenza, where around 90% of severe and fatal cases occur in people 65 years of age or older. Perhaps most significantly, clinicians from around the world are reporting a very severe form of disease, also in young and otherwise healthy people, which is rarely seen during seasonal influenza infections. In these patients, the virus directly infects the deeper lung, causing severe respiratory failure. Saving these lives depends on highly specialized and demanding care in intensive care units, usually with long and costly stays.The second wave could worsen as larger numbers of people become infected. The Second wave may affect resulting in 1.8 million hospitalizations and 90 000 deaths only in USAOne important hope and good news is that swine flue H1N1 virus is not yet became more virulent neither the virus has been mutated since appearing in Mexico in April 2009
    HIV Patients are not however at risk
    The 2009 influenza pandemic is the first to occur since the emergence of HIV/AIDS. Early data from two countries suggest that people co-infected with H1N1 and HIV are not at increased risk of severe or fatal illness, provided these patients are receiving antiretroviral therapy. In most of these patients, illness caused by H1N1 has been mild, with full recovery. On current estimates, around 33 million people are living with HIV/AIDS worldwide. Of these, WHO estimates that around 4 million were receiving antiretroviral therapy at the end of 2008.
    What is with Osletamivir?
    Anti-viral drugs Osletamivir are of questionable efficacy as per authors with some dangerous side effects like the ones reported in Japan people are, abusing of the regular flu vaccination, which is not useful for swine flu, used oseltamivir (Tamiflu) and zanamivir (Relenza) against people diagnosed with the virus. In India and in West Bengal provinces of India swine flue patients were treated with oseltamivir( Tamiflue) as per WHO guide line, only who were positive for viral DNA by RT PCR in their throat swab test in government tertiary care hospital setup. Mexico City,USA also used oseltamivir (Tamiflu) and zanamivir (Relenza) against people diagnosed with the virus.The Fact about Tamiflu [Oseltamivir] is that it may be able to delay the spread of the virus for a short period of time (but will not prevent it’s spread ultimately); that it can shorten the duration of the illness by about a day (but not the fact that it can save lives or even prevent serious complications of the flu); that it is “an unpleasant experience” to take with side effects ranging from nausea, vomiting, and hallucinations to serious, rare effects like Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis 4 . If the Tamiflue given permission to be open prescribed by General practitioners and if given permission for open sell in medicine shops, then a large proportion of patients by GPs then many will be there who will be offered this antivirals unnecessarily for a flue like illness with fever. Antiviral susceptibility testing has increased in several countries, confirming that pandemic H1N1 influenza virus remains sensitive to the antiviral oseltamivir, except for sporadic reports of oseltamivir resistant pandemic H1N1 virus detailed in the previous web update[3 cases till date]
    Vaccine is the solution
    The companies like CSL and Vaxine have both begun tests on their products swine flue vaccine.CSL carried tests on 240 healthy adult volunteers while Vaxine had 300O one group in the CSL trial got one dose, while a second group got two doses, on the basis that if just one does protects then there will be more vaccine to go round. In India CIPLA is trying to get a vaccine against Swine flue H1N1 virus.
    The first batch of vaccine for the influenza A/H1N1 2009 “swine flu” pandemic should be ready and licensed by October,2009,[1a] and the United Kingdom’s government has ordered enough vaccine for each person to receive two doses in their own country. However UK government has it’s prioritization plan already announced, and frontline healthcare workers will be among the first to be offered this vaccination. A questioner based study showed that the overall willingness to accept this pre-pandemic H5N1 vaccine was then only 28.4% in their first survey, conducted at WHO influenza pandemic alert phase 3. No significant changes in the level of willingness to accept pre-pandemic H5N1 vaccine were observed despite the escalation to alert phase 6. The willingness to accept pre-pandemic H1N1 vaccine was however 47.9% among healthcare workers when the WHO alert level was at phase 5. The most common reasons for an intention to accept were “wishes to be protected” and “following health authority’s advice.” The major barriers identified were fear of side effects and doubts about efficacy. More than half of the respondents thought nurses should be the first priority group to receive such swine flue vaccines. The strongest positive associating factors were history of seasonal influenza vaccination and perceived risk of contracting the infection. There remains other side also. A strong and growing opposition for swine flue vaccine growing. A survey published online this week in the BMJ found that just over half of 8500 healthcare workers in Hong Kong said they must not be vaccinated against swine flu because of strong fears of side effects and doubts about the vaccine’s effectiveness[ 2] And a survey by Israel’s ministry of health similarly found that at least 25% of the population is not willing to be vaccinated against swine flu2. Can we be sure that the new pandemic H1N1 vaccine will be as effective and safe as it is seasonal flu vaccines? The European Commission has already approved four “mock-up” vaccines developed by Baxter, GlaxoSmithKline, and Novartis on the basis of earlier immunogenicity and safety data generated with H5N1 virus strains particular concern for recipients may be the association of the 1976-77 swine flu vaccine with Guillain-Barré syndrome, with an attributable risk of around 12 cases per million vaccinations.3 This rare event has decreased greatly during the past 15 years (to around 0.7 reports/million vaccinations).[1a] More over swine flue virus may cause parkinsonism like bird flue H5N1,the virus can sneak into the brain via the peripheral nervous system and it may plays a role in killing dopamine neurons. But need not to be panic
    The fear is unnecessary. However a randomised control trial is vital
    How much vaccine is needed to cover the pandemic? If each shot of pandemic flu vaccine contains 15 micrograms of swine flue viral antigens — the dose used in seasonal flu — and no adjuvant, annual global capacity stands then at about 876 million doses, according to the WHO. But as virtually no one is immune to the virus, most experts said that each person will need two doses, immediately halving that capacity. Moreover, higher doses of antigen may be needed to get an adequate response, further reducing capacity. Using adjuvants would boost annual capacity — to more than two billion doses in some WHO projections. But such a huge amount of doses vaccine preparation will take much time. By this time a second wave is expected though no of cases has already declined. A sharp rise in cases during the winter months is expected as a second wave. In India, already more then 140 persons died of the swine flue. Will not Indian people, Indian health care givers, those dealing with swine flue patients and their family members need vaccination? In India, priority of swine flue vaccine should be first for healthcare professionals, chronically ill people, and children under 5. However a survey study showed that the potential benefits of influenza vaccination for healthcare workers are threefold—personal protection, protection of patients, and reduction of absenteeism,
    the current H1N1 (2009) pandemic influenza strain is co-circulating with a very similar seasonal A (H1N1) influenza virus in many countries, which may offer some cross-immunity via its more conserved internal proteins (e.g., the matrix and nucleoprotein) in individuals who have been recently infected naturally with this seasonal A (H1N1) virus
    If there is any significant cross-immunity conferred by antibodies raised to these internal viral proteins, this may mitigate the future scale of any pandemic with this virus. So, the eventual spread of this novel influenza A (H1N1) virus may not be as widespread.
    References
    1] Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 – update 63 ;Weekly update Global Alert and Response (GAR) World Health Organization
    1a ] Department of Health. Letter from office of David Nicholson chief executive of the NHS in England, 13 August 2009.http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/documents/digitalasset/dh_104309.pdf Editorials Should healthcare workers have the swine flu vaccine?Evidence from decades of seasonal vaccination suggests likely benefits and low risk of adverse events BMJ 2009;339:b3398
    2] Zosia Kmietowicz News Opposition to swine flu vaccine seems to be growing worldwide : BMJ2009;339:b3461
    3] Breman JG, Hayner NS. Guillain-Barré syndrome and its relationship to swine influenza vaccination in Michigan, 1976-1977. Am J Epidemiol 1984;119:880-9.
    4] Robert W Leckridge Questions about the swine flu strategy Rapid Responses published to feature article by Adrian O’Dowd A/H1N1 influenza update BMJ 2009; 339: b2977 on28 July 2009
    Copy Right- Copy Right of this comment"A second wave of swine flue coming in tropical countries" in Journal Nature  is Intellectual Property of Author & belongs to Professor Pranab kumar Bhattacharya and his first degree relatives only as per copy right act & rules of Intellectual Property Right Rules 3D/107/1201a,b/ RDF Copy Right rules/ SPARC copy Right rules-2006/ and Protect intellectual Property Right(PIP) copy right rules of USA-2012.Please do not Infringe and be enough careful for your own safety if you are not direct Blood relation to prof Pranab Kumar Bhattacharya
    sd/Professor Pranab kumar Bhattacharya
Professor ( Dr) Pranab kumar Bhattacharya MD( Univ.of calcutta) at 01:50 No comments:
Share

Monday, 18 November 2013

Of mice, men and rapamycin 09 Jul 2009 | 12:15 GMT | Posted by Daniel Cressey | Category: Health and medicine Comment Published in Nature







  1. Breaking news from the world of science


    Advanced search





    • News & Comment
    • News Blog
    • Post
    all copy.bmp
     What is Mechanism of action of Rapamycin for prolonging the age?http://blogs.nature.com/news/2009/07/of_mice_men_and_rapamycin.html
    Authors_ :P rofessor Pranab kumar Bhattacharya MD, FIC path(Ind.) , Professor of Pathology, In charge of Histopathology Unit, in charge Blood Bank &VCCTC, in charge of Cytogenetics. Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education & Research, 244a AJC Bose Road, Kolkta-20, West Bengal, India;Miss upasana Bhattacharya of Mahamyatala, Garia kol-86  Mr. Rupak Bhattacharya BSc(Cal)MSc(JU) of 7/51 purbapalli, Sodepur Dist 24 parganas(North) Kol-110, West Bengal, India; Mr Ritwik Bhattacharya; Dr. Tridib Mandal MD cal. Assistant Professor, dept. of Biochemistry, Dr. Hriday Das MD DTM&H(cal) Medical officer, Dept .of nephrology IPGMER, Dr. Jayanta Das Gupta MD DM Asssociate professor, Dept. Gastroenterology Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education & Research, 244a AJC Bose Road, Kolkta-20, West Bengal, India
    Rapamycin was originally isolated from a bacterium found on Rapa Nui, the indigenous name for Easter Island. Rapamycin (Rapamune®, Wyeth Ayerst, sirolimus) is a specific inhibitor of the target of rapamycin (TOR). Rapamycin is also a powerful suppressor of the human immune system, as cell anti proliferating drug, so commonly given to organ[Kidney] transplant patients[6mg as soon as after transplant, then 2mg daily for 2-3months as maintenance dose] to help to prevent the rejection of transplanted organs, used with cardiac drug eluting stents[to prevent proliferation of endothelial cells after stent] and may be used as a cancer adjuvant therapy, and also in autosomal dominent polycystic kidney disease. The drug is very costly approximately costs Rs12000/=, in Indian currency a month. Orthologue (mTOR), is also referred to as FKBP12-rapamycin associated protein (FRAP), rapamycin and FKBP12 target (RAFT), rapamycin target (RAPT), or sirolimus effector protein (SEP). mTOR lies downstream of IGF and has been implicated in several pathways that contribute to tumorigenesis, such as translation initiation and cap-dependent translation. The protein kinase TOR genes (TOR1 and TOR2) were first identified in the early 1990s in a screen for rapamycin-resistant yeast mutants1 . Rapamycin forms a complex with the immunophilin FK506 binding protein-12 (FKBP12), which binds to the FKBP12-rapamycin binding (FRB) domain of mTOR and inhibits its kinase activity. Rapamycin thus can inhibit the growth of a broad spectrum of cancers including rhabdomyosarcoma, neuroblastoma, glioblastoma, small cell lung carcinoma, osteosarcoma, pancreatic cancer, leukaemia, B-cell lymphoma, and breast and colon cancer-derived cells2The rapamycin analogues, CCI-779 (Wyeth-Ayerst, PA, USA), RAD001 (Novartis, Switzerland), and AP23573 (Ariad Pharmaceuticals, MA, USA) have shown promise in clinical trials3 .mTOR functions by integrating extracellular signals (growth factors and hormones), with amino-acid availability and intracellular energy status to control translation rates and additional metabolic processes4 .mTOR enhances translation initiation in part by phosphorylating two major targets, the eIF4E binding proteins (4E-BPs) and the ribosomal protein S6 kinases (S6K1 and S6K2) that cooperate to regulate translation initiation rates.5 In Peutz Jeghers syndrome, Tuberous Sclerosis, and other diseases where PTEN is inactivated, the use of rapamycin as a clinical means to reverse the effect of elevated mTOR activity is an attractive option5. These diseases are distinct from other hamartoma-associated disorders (such as VHL syndrome) since they have an established molecular link to mTOR. Earlier studies demonstrated that PTEN-inactivated tumour cells exhibit enhanced sensitivity to the rapamycin analog CCI-7796 More recently, several studies have shown that rapamycin treatment, in combination with other chemotherapeutic drugs, can lead to enhanced selective killing of cancer cells. In particular, the protein tyrosine kinase (PTK) inhibitor, Imatinib (Gleevec, STI571) synergises with rapamycin to inhibit BCR/ABL transformed cells7 . The effect of rapamycin may be enhanced as a result of Imatinib-induced Akt/mTOR signaling, a complication that is thought to lead to Imatinib resistance. Rapamycin can also synergise with paclitaxel, carboplatin, and vinorelbine to induce apoptosis in breast cancer cells8 Cisplatin-induced apoptosis of A549 lung cancer cells is also significantly enhanced when combined with RAD0019 . This could be in part due to reduced translation of p53-activated p21 mRNA in A549 and MCF7 cells treated with RAD001, thereby allowing the dosage of cisplatin to be reduced Also, the use of theEGFR/VEGFR inhibitor, AEE788, in combination with RAD001 greatly decreased tumour growth in glioma xenografts (Goudar et al, 2005). Furthermore, targeting the glycolytic pathway in combination with mTOR inhibition may also be useful in cases where DNA-damaging agents are less efficient in inhibiting growth and promoting apoptosis of cancer cells10 .Aging is the progressive, universal decline first in functional reserve and then in function that occurs in organisms over time. Aging is heterogeneous. It varies widely in different individuals and in different organs within a particular individual. Aging is not a disease; however, the risk of developing disease is increased, often dramatically, as a function of age. The biochemical composition of tissues changes with age; physiologic capacity decreases, the ability to maintain homeostasis in adapting to stressors declines, and vulnerability to disease processes increases with age. After maturation, mortality rate increases exponentially with age
    Some Theories of Aging11Hypothesis How It May Work- Genetic Aging is a genetic program activated in post-reproductive life when an individual’s evolutionary mission is accomplishedOxidative stressAccumulation of oxidative damage to DNA, proteins, and lipids interferes with normal function and produces a decrease in stress responsesMitochondrial dysfunction A common deletion in mitochondrial DNA with age compromises function and alters cell metabolic processes and adaptability to environmental changeHormonal changes The decline and loss of circadian rhythm in secretion of some hormones produces a functional hormone deficiency state
    Telomere shortening Aging is related to a decline in the ability of cells to replicateDefective host defenses The failure of the immune system to respond to infectious agents and the over activity of natural immunity create vulnerability to environmental stressesAccumulation of senescent cells Renewing tissues become dysfunctional through loss of ability to renew
    So it is not well understood how rapamycin actually prolongs life affecting the ageing process and how its connected to calorie restriction and ageing? Through sirolimus effectors protein (SEP)? Then ageing process can be slowed by a drug therapy starting at an advanced age? should healthy individuals over age 50 consider taking rapamycin to slow his/her ageing?. However it is too costly therapy then. Moreover there are many adverse drug reactions of rapamycin like opportunistic infections, lynmhocele lymphoedema, sepsis, tachycardia hepatotoxicity susceptibilities to lymhoma and other malignancies, exfoliative dermatities azospermia to name a few. Mice are known to live longer if fed a calorie-restricted diet that is close to starvation levels, but this would be very difficult for a person to maintain. what should be the dose?
    References
    1 Heitman J, Movva NR, Hall MN Targets for cell cycle arrest by the immunosuppressant rapamycin in yeast. Science1991; 253: 905–909 |
    2Huang S, Houghton PJ Inhibitors of mammalian target of rapamycin as novel antitumor agents: from bench to clinic. Curr Opin Investig Drugs 2002;3: 295–304 |
    3 Panwalkar A, Verstovsek S, Giles FJ Mammalian target of rapamycin inhibition as therapy for hematologic malignancies. Cancer2004; 100: 657–666 |
    4 Hay N, Sonenberg N Upstream and downstream of mTOR. Genes Dev2004; 18: 1926–1945
    5E Petroulakis, Y Mamane, O Le Bacquer, D Shahbazian and N Sonenberg mTOR signaling: implications for cancer and anticancer therapy British Journal of Cancer 2006; 94, 195–199. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6602902 http://www.bjcancer.com/Published online 13 December 2005
    6 Guertin DA, Sabatini DM An expanding role for mTOR in cancer. Trends Mol Med 2005;11: 353–361
    7 Mohi MG, Boulton C, Gu TL, Sternberg DW, Neuberg D, Griffin JD, Gilliland DG, Neel BG Combination of rapamycin and protein tyrosine kinase (PTK) inhibitors for the treatment of leukemias caused by oncogenic PTKs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA2004; 101: 3130–3135
    8 Mondesire WH, Jian W, Zhang H, Ensor J, Hung MC, Mills GB, Meric-Bernstam F Targeting mammalian target of rapamycin synergistically enhances chemotherapy-induced cytotoxicity in breast cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res2004; 10: 7031–7042
    9 Beuvink I, Boulay A, Fumagalli S, Zilbermann F, Ruetz S, O’Reilly T, Natt F, Hall J, Lane HA, Thomas G The mTOR inhibitor RAD001 sensitizes tumor cells to DNA-damaged induced apoptosis through inhibition of p21 translation. Cell 2005;120: 747–759
    10 Xu RH, Pelicano H, Zhang H, Giles FJ, Keating MJ, Huang P () Synergistic effect of targeting mTOR by rapamycin and depleting ATP by inhibition of glycolysis in lymphoma and leukemia cells. Leukemia2005; 19: 2153–2158
    11 Lisa B. Caruso; Aging; Chapter 9. Geriatric Medicine page at Harrison’s Internal Medicine17th ed edited by
    © Copy Right- Copy Right of this comment What is Mechanism of action of Rapamycin for prolonging the age?Published in Journal Nature News is Intellectual Property of authors & belongs to Professor Pranab kumar Bhattacharya and his first degree relatives only as per copy right act & rules of Intellectual Property Right Rules 3D/107/1201a,b/ RDF Copy Right rules/ SPARC copy Right rules-2006/ and Protect intellectual Property Right(PIP) copy right rules of USA-2012.Please do not try even to Infringe and be enough careful for your own safety if you are not direct Blood relation to prof Pranab Kumar Bhattacharya  . No person, no pharmaceuticals company  no NGOS [ except the authors& first degree relatives]  in the state of West Bengal or in any other states of India or in any abroad countries are authorized  ever to use this article, with any meaning full,  scientific sentences or with scientific and meaning full words laid out in this article either in the class room/  or in mass teaching programme including CME  or  in any form or promotion or self use  what so ever it is with any content of this article or while in writing any book or for his/her personal/ home use, or collective works or for any future Research or implementation as a policy matter or,[ except the authors ]or  by Xeroxing and distributing the article/ or by printing/saving/broadcasting the article from any website of internet services,displayed without proper copy right clearance from the authors or from his family members or future copy right owner by written forms.  by order- Sd/Professor Pranab Kumar Bhattacharya WBMES


Professor ( Dr) Pranab kumar Bhattacharya MD( Univ.of calcutta) at 22:51 No comments:
Share

Totally drug-resistant TB emerges in India Discovery of a deadly form of TB highlights crisis of 'mismanagement' Comment Published in Nature












International weekly journal of science


Advanced search



  • Home
  • News & Comment
  • Research
  • Careers & Jobs
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Audio & Video
  • For Authors



  • News & Comment
  • News
  • 2013
  • January
  • Article






NATURE | NEWS









International weekly journal of science


Advanced search




  • Home
  • News & Comment
  • Research
  • Careers & Jobs
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Audio & Video
  • For Authors




  • News & Comment
  • News
  • 2013
  • November
  • Article








http://archive.is/QnJvm
Prof. Pranab Kumar Bhattacharya•2012-01-21 07:26 AM
Even in 21st century are we loosing the battle against eradication of an ancient oldest bacterial diseases by M. Tuberculosis due to poverty, unemployment, under nutrition, HIV and inadequate free quality supply of ATD drugs, microscopy, [ through DOTS] cultural confirmation ,delay in rapid diagnosis and high tech based confirmation of Mycobacteria and of emerging MDR and even TDR ?
Authors
*Professor Pranab Kumar Bhattacharya MD(cal), FIC Path(Ind), Professor and Head, Dept. of Pathology, Now in Calcutta School of Tropical Medicine, 108 C.R avenue ,Kolkata-73, W.B , India, In charge Convener DCP &DLT Course of WBUHS **Miss Upasana Bhattacharya  Daughter of Prof. P.K. Bhattacharya 
Actually in India even after its 69 years of its Independences and 12th such 5th years plan for eradication of poverty and in spite of high economic growth rate near 9 , is probably the highest of killer diseases, like Tuberculosis (M. Tuberculosis) burden country Globally, if the authors is not however wrong, accounting 1/5th of Global incidence of only Pulmonary TB and 1/3rd of in south Asia. According to WHO in 2007, out of total Global 9,3 million cases of TB, 1.4 million cases and 48,000 death is related to HIV and TB co- infections and the epidemiology of MAC TB is modified today by HIV infection which is causing an increase in occurrences of new TB cases and generation of CAT1 & or CAT 2 drug resistances cases(MDR TB) affecting not only individuals but also their close contacts keens and general population of the close community. The Tuberculosis in India and in one of provinces in India like West Bengal ( where Left front party ruled since 1977] are mostly due to extreme level of economic poverty to purchase their minimum required food, lack of necessary calorie, nutrition in the affected family members in low socioeconomic classes , joblessness, lock out in small and medium size industries in the open market mixed economy of India, huge numbers of unemployment amongst economically active youths ( it exceeded more then 1.8 cores general stream graduate level or High school level educated young generation amongst 8.6 cores population in provinces of West Bengal, India census 2001), non workers, laborers, high prices for essential foods purchase , low per capita income in sub urban (bellow poverty line(BPL) Per capita income per month Rs 450 and poverty line people ], urban slum dwellers, colony people, many hawkers maid servants ,watch men and in rural population, illiteracy, and TB is mainly predominant and rampant today within low socioeconomic income group people ( who are the main working /labor forces of the state / India ) of the province of West Bengal, India ( approx.38. population as per author ) and in people BPL (29%) . This ancient Myco Bacterial disease is not usually found in upper middle class and sudden raised middle class and rich class Population with high economic stability (25-30%) having cars, flats with decoration with or without A/c, though other bacterial infections & other diseases for over nutrition { as for example, obesity, metabolic syndrome and sequel, seen in these class. Why?. As the TB is related with CD4 T cell immunity and by delayed type hypersensitivity-Type IV (Th1.and Th2. T cells) which falls with gross level poverty & low calorie consumption for long time. At least, the present first author as a Histo pathologist never encountered in his medical 27 years carrier in hospitalâ&#x80&#x99s Lab Set up ,unless that person is some how Immuno compromised for CD4 T cells for some other diseases like Diabetes, taking various kinds of immunosupressive drugs, steroids or under gone any organ transplants or HIV. Nearly 45% population in India is today, affected by TB and in West Bengal alone is house of 1.5 to 3.5 million people per year and in India there are 500,000 deaths occur annually due to TB only?. NTCP followed by RNTCP i.e Revised National TB control program was initiated in the year 1993 by GOI as DOT program strategy. There was political, administrative and organizational commitment too, for short course of DOT (6 months therapy) through which ensuring poor class comprehensive TB control services to reach at Sub center level (SHC) of the country with reliable sputum smear microscopy, good quality anti TB drugs, effective and patient friendly treatment to be given under direct observations and accountability to establish with health care system of the state. Then came revised RNTCP. The objective of revised RNTCP started in 2000, whose objective was to achieve 85% cure rate amongst new/old smear positive cases initiated on treatment and case detection rate raising up to 70% of affected. But there were not really enough existing infrastructure, enough staffs, enough human resources, free essential quality anti TB drugs, human resources to decentralize the activity through creation of Sub-sub divisional level supervisory teams comprising of a senior treatment supervisor, senior laboratory supervisor and designated trained chest Medical officers ,enough reliable microscopy centers with trained persons to examine AFB, free supply of quality Anti TB drugs (CAT-1/CAT-2/CAT-3] and trained personal though some norms and guide line was formulated for these attempts. Result was quite expected and there is raise of TB incidences. TB, HIV, Malaria, MRDM, Diarrhea ARI low birth weight baby and ARI are always diseases of poverty and should be other indicators of Health structure development of a country, or of a state. It is the matter of shame for a welfare government too that TB is raising in the state. 
Quite obviously and unexpectedly , very soon ,West Bengal and India faced the challenges of Drug Resistance TB { for long years continued use of these two drugs ] to first INH and then Refampicin ( two drugs) and the real cause was deficient and detoriating TB control program, inefficient administration of effective therapy at free of cost to poor people, use of substandard quality ATD drugs in hospitals, ignorance of health workers about the disease , inadequate admission facility in govt. hospitals during emergency period, replace of blood during severe Hemoptasis; Interruptions of ATD chemotherapy and non adherence due to various reasons ,side effects of toxic drugs and market costs of Anti TB drugs to those people who can not even earn food for them as prevention of TB or non availability, low nutrition status , may have massive bacillary load and delay in identification of TB and lack of uniform laboratory methodology in the state metropolis, prescribing some times of high tech very costly gadgets like Bachtech and PCR identification of the bacteria.
Then came MDR TB in India and in West Bengal too in early 1990s so far author remembers. They are TB which are resistant to two or more effective anti TB drugs available like INH and Refampicin. Those patients who are not MDR TB can be still cured by 6-9 months of treatment if taken regularly. But problem with MDR TB require at least18-24 months treatment and treatment are very toxic for the body itself and are expensive too. In West Bengal, at least stamping a person with MDR TB is equivalent to stamp his death certificate also. The classical threat of TB epidemics started as MDR TB and often that was use or misuse or the antibacterial agents has emerged the evolution towards resistance resulting often treatment failure. There was not stop. There appeared then sporadic XDR TB in India and also in West Bengal . TB in community XDR TB so far authors knowledge is, has been detected in India on an average 1.6% of TB population in India since 2004 to 2007 when MDR was 34% on average. The one possibility of XDR TB may be association with HIV ,though it is only 6% roughly of XDR TB. What about the rest? And now the threat appeared however, Totally drug-resistant tuberculosis (TDR-TB), i.e incurable TB, though are sparse, rare, one or two isolated cases. That are in association with HIV. But so far Knowledge of the author there is no equipped laboratory to diagnose TDR TB except one or two in Delhi. In Maharastra, Mumbai, 2cases of TDR were detected in 2011. Before these Twelve (12) cases of TDR were confirmed. Giovanni Migliori, The Director of the World Health Organization (WHO) Collaborating Centre for Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases in Tradate, Italy, suggests that TDR-TB is a deadlier iteration of the highly resistant forms of TB that have been increasingly reported over the past decade in poor socio economic classes. Totally resistant TB is so not new at all, he said. Since the 1960s, two drugs  isoniazid and rifampicin  had been standard TB treatment. Although episodes of resistance cropped up periodically, during the 1990s the incidence of multiple drug resistance (MDR) grew significantly, leading researchers in 2006 to refer to it as extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR-TB). Surveillance data from the WHO indicated that XDR-TB is present in at least in 58 countries, with an estimated 25,000 cases occurring each and every year. WHO till this date describes TB as a disease of poverty and extreme level, poverty who have no purchase capacity for minimum basic need to live as human, drug-resistant varieties might best be understood as resulting from poor treatment. According to a 2011, WHO report, fewer than 5% of newly diagnosed or previously treated patients were tested for drug resistance. And it is estimated that just 16% of patients with drug-resistant TB are receiving appropriate treatment. The cases are a story of mismanagement,said Migliori. Resistance is here man-made, caused by exposure to the wrong treatment, the wrong regimen, the wrong treatment duration. But for author besides the Statement of Migliori, MDR or TDR molecular studies showed drug resistance in M tuberculosis is mutation in the drug target genes and effector pump The pharmaceutical industry has scant interest in TB for decades, together The industry pretty much concluded it wasn't an attractive market, and there was not enough potential profit.
So the Battle for TB is loosing by us. Control of TB must be governmental programmed and that must be based on program ,objective and effectiveness of interventions and applications of resources According this author the first priority to cut of chain of transmission of bacilli by giving food and nutrient to people at BPL or PL level, free early diagnosis, quality sputum microscopy, free provisions of quality anti TB drugs through DOTS ,achieving any how 85% cure rate, universal poor friendly access of free DOTS, to reduce morbidity and mortality and secondary priority expansion of case detection and treatment at free costs in private hospitals, use of free culture for diagnosis of smear negative cases even, formulation of guide line for extra pulmonary cases, identification, surveillance of drug resistance cases at free cost even in private set up hospitals in the country, monitoring of cost effectiveness and rationalizations of care, expansion of tuberculosis packages to care for MDR tuberculosis particularly for immuno suppressive groups and HIV parsons.
Copy Right- Copy Right of this comment in Journal Nature belongs to Professor Pranab kumar Bhattacharya and his first degree relatives only as per copy right act & rules of Intellectual Property Right Rules 3D/107/1201 a,b/ RDF Copy Right rules/ SPARC copy Right rules-2006/ and Protect intellectual Property Right(PIP) copy right rules of USA-2012.Please do not Infringe and be enough careful for your own safety if you are not direct Blood relation to prof Pranab Kumar Bhattacharya  . No person, No NGOS [ except the authors& first degree relatives]  in the state of West Bengal or in any states of India or in any abroad countries are authorized to use this article, with any meaning full,  scientific sentences or with scientific and meaning full words laid out in this article either in the class room/  or in mass teaching programme including CME  or  in any form what so ever it is with any content of this article or while in writing any book or for his/her personal/ home use, or collective works or for any future Research or implementation as a policy matter or,[ except the authors ]or  by Xeroxing and distributing the article/ or by printing/saving/broadcasting the article from any website of internet services,displayed without proper copy right clearance from the authors or from his family members or future copy right owner by written forms. 
Professor ( Dr) Pranab kumar Bhattacharya MD( Univ.of calcutta) at 22:36 No comments:
Share
‹
›
Home
View web version

About Me

My photo
Professor ( Dr) Pranab kumar Bhattacharya MD( Univ.of calcutta)
Please read short biography in URL https://www.insc.in/awards/singleinfo.php?tid=953
View my complete profile
Powered by Blogger.